Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 3841 - 3860 of 25,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 pm
The United States Supreme Court today ruled that criminal defendants have the constitutional right to effective representation when making the decision as to whether or not to accept a plea bargain. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law of conviction, and Jesner v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
It has been a week since the Court announced that it would review United States v. [read post]
In both Gonzalez and Taamneh, the Solicitor General will also be arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Fittingly, the case on their docket that day is one of the biggest of the year: Trump v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 6:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Insurance lawyers in the Dallas and Fort Worth, plus other parts of the state, need to read this 2022, United States 5th Circuit opinion. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner was a Canadian citizen, while Respondent and R were United States citizens. [read post]