Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 3841 - 3860 of 27,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2017, 1:30 pm by Brian G. Thompson
In 2013 the Court of Appeal heard the case of Doe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:46 am by Nicola Ai Ling Prall
The Employer advertised using the San Antonio Express (“Express-News”) for its Sunday newspaper advertisement requirement, 20 CFR 656.17(e)(1)(i)(B)(1). [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 11:01 am by oliver
Hence, the wording “produced by” does not exclude that the product can be obtained by other processes. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 8:15 am by Gene Takagi
The question: “Does the organization share revenue or governance with any other non-profit organization (e.g., fiscal sponsorships and affiliations)? [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Phyllis Pollack
Glucose depletion), System 1 does kick in ( as is typical when we are tired) causing us to make intuitive, irrational and thus, very poor decisions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
1/22/20 Red State Challenge to Affordable Care Act Goes to SCOTUS (But the Arguments Remain Incredibly Weak) (Updated)—3/2/20 Will the Trump Administration Finally Abandon Its Bizarre Position in the Texas ACA Case? [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:50 pm by Stanley D. Baum
The Press Release further says that the EBSA had published a participant-level regulation on Oct. 20, 2010. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
I know that sounds so much like lawyer double talk but let me explain why it is not (or maybe show why we cannot always give a simple answer to an abstract question).IC 31-16-8-1(b) sets out how often a child support order may be modified:Except as provided in section 2 of this chapter, modification may be made only:(1) upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable; or (2) upon a showing that: (A) a party has… [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:44 am by Jason Byrne
   Justices Cavanaugh and Kelly concurred in the result, finding that MCL 168.467m(1) also authorized holdovers and does not conflict with the Michigan Constitution. [read post]