Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3841 - 3860 of 4,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
A judgment in from the European Court of Human Rights from February 9 on Richard Anderson v U.K, ruled that the absence of effective court case management in Court of Session proceedings failed to meet the right to a fair trial within the terms of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am by nyinjuries
The plaintiff has produced a copy of the police blotter log reports for 41 and 43 High Street, Hempstead, New York, from May 1, 2002 through June 1, 2007, approximately five years prior to the incident. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:44 pm by Mike
· 1 solicitor advocate (10% of the 10 who applied). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by MacIsaac
[8]        An occupier’s duty of care does not require the occupier to remove every possibility of danger. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
Roth[1] offers important clues as to the scope of the use of derivatives in companies dealing with agricultural commodities. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Buce
But they believe in a lot of things that the standard liberal agenda does not embrace--markets, lower trade barriers. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am by Beck, et al.
We agree with the defendants that permitting [plaintiff] to proceed on the theory that the defendants violated §43(a) merely by placing their drugs on the market would, in effect, permit [plaintiff] to use the Lanham Act as a vehicle by which to enforce the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:27 pm by SOIssues
SORP applies to adult and juvenile sex offenders convicted or adjudicated on or after September 1, 1970 (an ex post facto law). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Dave
The initial issue was the Doran/Taylor issue, ie at what point does the gateway (b) claim arise? [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:50 am by Cathy from Lowell
The complainant should have experienced 3 instances of harassment which is defined here in section 1 : "...acts of willful and malicious conduct aimed at a specific person committed with the intent to cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property and that does in fact cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property; or (ii) an act that: (A) by force, threat or duress causes another to involuntarily engage in sexual relations; or (B) constitutes a violation of… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:34 am by Steve Hall
"The court can change its mind, and it often does ... but I doubt the court would overturn so recent a decision. [read post]