Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 4,698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 1:28 am
If you're going to run for elective office in the United States of America in the early twenty-first century (or indeed at any time to date in our nation's history) you need to prepare for someone to deliberately and maliciously misrepresent your record and to fight fire with fire. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:13 am
Whether the word “racist” is used as a noun or an adjective in combination with other words does not matter.Second, in my view, the majority misapplies the United States Supreme Court opinions in Milkovich v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:41 pm
There's also U.S. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm
This led to the key decision of Wickard v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:53 pm
Nor does it need to. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
Most of my arguments have been in courts of appeals, only a handful in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
§ 416.1618(b)(17), which provides that an alien is PRUCOL if he is "living in the United States with the knowledge and permission of the Immigration and NaturalizationService and whose departure that agency does not contemplate enforcing. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:46 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
See Determination of Threatened Status for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States, 64 Fed.Reg. 58,910 (Nov. 1, 1999). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.United States of America v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
(IP Dragon) China cracks down on software piracy (PlagiarismToday) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules wrongful use of AdWord will infringe trade mark (Class 46) Europe EPO and Google partner up on patent translations (Inovia IP) (IPKat) (IP Osgoode) L’Oréal v eBay: What the Advocate General says (IPKat) Rapidshare hit with Euro 150,000 fine (PlagiarismToday) France Google loses French trademark appeal against Luteciel and Viaticum (Ron Coleman’s… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 5:43 am
" United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
., Petitioners v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
He asks why America has the death penalty when Europe has abandoned it. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
This principle does not however apply for final injunctions obtained at trial (Jockey Club v Buffham [2003] QB 462). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:02 am
Yes (Michael Geist) Liberals preparing C-32 amendments on digital locks & fair dealing (Michael Geist) UBC launches license database as Access Copyright Agreement nears expiry (Michael Geist) Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore on how copyright can treat consumers unfairly (Michael Geist) Quebec National Assembly passes motion criticizing C-32 (Michael Geist) Separating copyright facts from fiction ahead of legislative hearings (Michael Geist) China Microsoft win in China over pirated… [read post]
