Search for: "Don v. Don" Results 3841 - 3860 of 42,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 am by Daniel Nazer
If trolls don’t face consequences for asserting invalid software patents, then they will continue to shake down productive companies. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:26 am by Vera Ranieri
DietGoal appealed that decision, but given the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Alice v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:11 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Last Friday, the Federal Circuit heard en banc argument on whether it should adopt a U.S. rule of international patent exhaustion in Lexmark v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:05 am by Walter Olson
” [Venkat Balasubramani, Eric Goldman's Technology & Marketing Law Blog; Matot v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 7:53 am by Louise Rosen Byer
Apparently, researchers have found that when we are on the job believing that we don’t have enough family or personal time, that itself drains and distracts us. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:50 pm
If you don't like the case, the case never existed:  Ordinarily, the decision to settle a case while an appeal is pending means giving up the opportunity to set a legal precedent as well as forgoing the chance to win a reversal of any unfavorable published decisions handed down by the lower court.But a team of defense lawyers fighting to overturn a $24 million verdict have figured out a way to have their settlement cake and eat their jurisprudence, too.The confidential… [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:14 pm
New posts at Section 1983 Blog, including one on Al-Kidd v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:31 pm
  Accordingly, the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.Davis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Robert Barnes/Washington Post, Julie Goldscheid/SCOTUSBlog, Michael Greve on oral argument in Mach Mining v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Laura Orr
Now that WWDTM (Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me) has included this case in their radio quiz program, maybe I should catch up on blogging about it - especially since the contestant didn’t know the answer. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:01 pm
Supreme Court in Kansas v Hendricks because it does not link an individual's mental illness to his dangerousness. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
The lower part of Miami-Dade ballot contains non-partisan races that often don't get the attention they deserve. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:18 am by Eric Guttag
I would argue, as did Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion and Justice Breyer’s dissenting opinion (joined by Justice Ginsburg) that a “yes” answer to that question defies logic, reason, and prior case precedent (other than the Federal Circuit’s 1991 case of FilmTec Corp. v. [read post]