Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 9,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
So perhaps, this might be a good time to haul out an old Ronald Reagan quote:The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'Other posts on the substance of Riegel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 10:30 pm
The court referred to Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk v Byleveldt 1973 (2) SA 146 (A) and the English case of Parry v Cleaver 1970 A.C. 1, and quoted Lord Reid: “It would be revolting to the ordinary person’s sense of justice, and therefore contrary to public policy, that the sufferer should have their damages reduced so that they could gain nothing from the benevolence of friends or relatives or of the public at large and that the only gainer would be the… [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Flores (08-294), on state power to control English language instruction (cases consolidated for one-hour argument) On Tuesday, the Court may release the opinion in one or more pending cases. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:57 am
After he came to the United States in 1968, he received a Ph.D. in Adapted Physical Education and Child Development, as well as an MBA in international finance and a M.Sc. in Teaching English as a Second Language. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:20 pm
See Robert v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Dicey used similar langauge to describe English law in the nineteenth century. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:55 pm
District Court ruled in Taitz v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:08 am
Recalling the ruling given by the International Court of Justice itself in 2012, in the case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 3:04 pm
"http://www.nevadajudiciary.us/index.php/advancedopinions/786-boorman-v-nevada-meml-cremation-society [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:33 pm
V. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 7:00 am
(Blanks v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 2:53 pm
We don't do ads on this blog, but I will tell you where to get this one.The statute Bill referred to is the one involved in the Supreme Court's "fish overboard" case of last term, Yates v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:27 am
Even taking the evidence in the light most favorable to [plaintiff] and assuming that [accused product] does so 99% of the time, 99% is not 'always.'" Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:57 pm
by Brian Wolfman The Second Circuit today issued Ross v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:01 am
” [Deutsch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
The case is United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:42 am
” This highly ranked journal reports in English on the latest decisions of Germany’s federal courts. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:40 pm
Prince Albert: consort and litigant The second item in the little bundle of photocopied articles on IP history which this Kat researched and wrote back in the 1980s, when he was still a full-time academic, deals with the background to a seminal case in English IP history: Prince Albert v Strange (1849), the judicial ruling which provided the basis upon which equitable relief for breach of confidence grew into what has subsequently become a highly-developed and sophisticated body of… [read post]
