Search for: "Ex Parte Clear"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 5,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
" The Court held open the possibility of "eccentric cases" in which the employee makes clear his approval of the conduct in conveying the information (for example, describing a racist joke as hilarious probably wouldn't count as opposing the joke-telling).o o January 26, 2009 decision hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Leidecker represented as part of his job. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
Now, the two individual ex-employees of ACORN aren’t public figures, so they wouldn’t have to satisfy the New York Times standard for public figures. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 10:06 am
I will make my case in two parts. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
If there is a clear danger that the other party will convey or encumber the subject property, you can file the motion “ex parte” – that is, without the other side being notified in advance, however, do you do have to make that factual showing there is an emergency. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:55 pm
The application to introduce closed material procedures will take place ex-parte and it is likely the judge will hear only from the Secretary of State and the party seeking the closed material proceedings, if different. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:12 am
”[10] It is clear, though, that by the onset of modern era the crime had become recognized as so abhorrent as to render the status of hostis humani generis upon the criminal. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
There is much speculation that the Court intended to decide the broad First Amendment questions when it first decided to hear an appeal in Masterpiece Cakeshop but then lost the will to do so, perhaps concluding that recognizing any free speech right on the part of businesses in this setting would unleash a torrent of litigation with no clear limiting principle that would destabilize whole areas of law. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:16 am
As the court observed, “By its clear terms, Minn. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
Madam Justice Allen notes, [4] On a standard of “clear and convincing evidence”, the Plaintiffs proved their claim to the satisfaction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:09 pm
S. 307-308 (1880); Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:53 am
This technology has proliferated, in large part, because many customers find the use of chatbotsto be helpful in navigating their purchases online. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:17 am
The consequence of a USPTO determination that any of the information in the request for supplemental examination raises a substantial new question of patentability would be a reexamination proceeding which differs from the usual ex parte reexamination in two principal respects. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Part of the problem is that the remuneration package of parish clergy/ministers normally includes a rent-free parsonage house, and it is not yet clear whether that will be taken into account in the Home Office’s calculation of overall earnings for the purposes of the raised minimum income level necessary for a visa. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
" My prediction that the Court will grant the petition and hear the case is based not only on the fact that this is a pretty important question of constitutional law, but on the existence of a clear split of authority on the matter. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
“The law is clear in Illinois that only authenticated copies or originals of judicial records are admissible for the purposes of showing the content of those records. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:45 am
It becomes a legal obligation on the part of the authority that prope [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:02 pm
Note also that the lower court allowed the case to proceed pseudonymously before the 2022 California Court of Appeal decision that made clear that pseudonymous litigation is highly disfavored in California courts. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:27 pm
Although British merchants and traders, to their great shame, played a major part in the trans-Atlantic slave trade throughout the 1600s and 1700s, Britain was then at the forefront of the abolition of the slave trade and slavery from 1807 onwards and the common law has always considered slavery to be abhorrent (as the famous case of ex parte Somersett in 1772 made clear). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:17 am
The consequence of a USPTO determination that any of the information in the request for supplemental examination raises a substantial new question of patentability would be a reexamination proceeding which differs from the usual ex parte reexamination in two principal respects. [read post]
