Search for: "Goldstein "
Results 3841 - 3860
of 5,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2006, 4:51 pm
The firm, Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLP, created their "brochure, corresponding web site and ads, ... to separate [their] law firm from the competition by stating [their] values in a simple, clear and succinct manner and ... with a professional sense of humor demonstrated by using the nationally renowned New Yorker cartoons. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm
The blog, along with lawyers from the law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., produced a series of posts examining Gorsuch’s views on a variety of topics to provide a sense of how Gorsuch might change the court, if at all. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:36 am
Mays 18-1132 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Philipp (Julia Mikolajczak & Daniel Bialer, Cornell Legal Information Institute) [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is among counsel for Rosalie Simon and the other plaintiffs in Hungary v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:20 pm
Goldstein, Vincent C. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 4:01 pm
Kappos to include Monday’s ruling and commentary by SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein; the case page for Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:23 pm
"At SCOTUS Blog, founder Tom Goldstein notes, "New Filing: Reply Brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
The second article is authored by Gerald Goldstein. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
What is, if not surprising, at least a bit depressing, is how few prominent liberal commentators have spoken out against the ongoing attempted Emmanuel Goldsteinization of the Kochs.Indeed, Hans Bader points out that even the ACLU, as noted a major Koch beneficiary, has helped organize anti-Koch rallies, though the Kochs involvement in small government economic issues seems rather far removed from what is supposed to be the ACLU’s core agenda. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:02 pm
City of New York (No. 06-134); Joseph Goldstein has this article in the New York Sun. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:24 pm
Pete Times edit, PolitickerNJ, NJLJ] The Amiable Nancy (1818), admiralty case that could prove crucial precedent in Exxon Valdez punitive appeal, has nothing to do with The Charming Betsey (1804), key precedent on international law [Anchorage Daily News; Tom Goldstein/Legal Times] "First do no harm... to your attorney's case" [Cole/Dallas Morning News via KevinMD] Probers haven't come up with evidence of more than middling tiger-taunting, and attorney Geragos says… [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:02 pm
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Lane v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:09 am
Goldstein, 161 A.D.3d 472, 473 (1st Dep’t 2018); Cabrera v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in this case.] [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
However, in Goldstein v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:57 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among counsel to the petitioners in the Alabama redistricting cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:25 am
If you haven't had enough Kagan coverage, here's what Tom Goldstein says are 3 overlooked issues:First, as Nina Totenberg first reported, Kagan signed this letter in 2005 strongly protesting Lindsay Graham’s amendment to limit the Guantanamo Bay detainees’ access to federal courts. [read post]
