Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 3841 - 3860 of 6,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
The trial court granted summary judgment against Marino and the Appellate Division affirmed. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 10:46 am by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court, 53 Cal. 4th 1004 (2012), a number of cases were remanded to Courts of Appeal for further consideration after Petition grant and hold Orders were issued in those cases. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 9:48 am by blogarbadmin
In this Guest Post, FELIPE SPERANDIO updates us on Brazilian Superior Court’s interesting decision holding that once an arbitral tribunal is in place, it shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to grant any interim measures. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
Family Court Jurisdiction to Divide Jointly Titled Properties Acquired Before Marriage or Domestic Partnership Registration: Family Code Section 2650 My office seems to be the final resting place for a number of complex property and support cases that have gone sideways under the management of prior counsel. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Neemuch Emballage Ltd., Mumbai was granted financial assistance by Andhra Bank under various facilities. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 10:03 am
Chesterton Co., (Massachusetts Superior Court, Middlesex, Civil Action 2011-3000), Massachusetts Superior Court Justice Charles J. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Meanwhile, the California Supreme Court has posted its statement of the issues on review in Iskanian (review granted last week): (1) Did AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:34 am by admin
July 28, 2011) (granting preliminary injunction in part because employee acknowledged that breach of post-employment obligations would entitle employer to injunctive relief); Ayco Co., L.P. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm by Gordon Firemark
Superior Court, the court of appeal issued a writ of mandate compelling the trial court to grant Touchstone’s motion, holding that the company’s decision not to renew the contract was not a termination, and that Sheridan could not maintain a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy because “a decision not to renew a contract set to expire is not actionable in tort. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:13 pm by Michael
Superior Court (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 208 (Mabry) approvingly. [read post]