Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2008, 7:05 am
In Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:41 am
If such an order were issued, Texas would become the first state to be subject to preclearance in the post-Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
[www.angel-diaz.us]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Patton v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:51 pm
Co. v. 21st Ave. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 8:26 am
In Mauna Kea Anaina Hou v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:48 pm
In applying the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, it held that an sovereign's immunity waiver for a specific forum abroad does not extend to a U.S. court. The court examined an implied-waiver exception and a commercial-activity exception. Generally, a foreign state is not immune from suit when it has waived such immunity or the suit is based on certain forms of commercial activity. The court based its decision on Creighton Ltd.… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
On May 25, 2012, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:05 am
Blue v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But in a recent ruling, in Sessions v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:50 pm
On May 27, 2009, in the case of State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm
Supreme Court (in the case of Clark v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:32 am
See State of Washington, Department of Transportation v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:32 am
See State of Washington, Department of Transportation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:17 pm
¶40 (quoting Bingham School v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 3:31 pm
Penney Nat'l Bank v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:55 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 3:53 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Based on a close reading of the 163 nondelegation cases, Stiglitz found that, in 22 of these, the state courts held that the challenged state statutes violated the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
