Search for: "JONES v. THE STATE" Results 3841 - 3860 of 6,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
State of Maryland, Court of Appeals 2006 Term, No. 59. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
” Rulings Three rulings have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: 03737-18 Jones v walesonline.co.uk, Clause 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy) and 12 (discrimination), no breach after investigation. 04100-18 The Transparency Project v Mail Online, Clause 1, no breach after investigation. 04786-18 Hobson v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Jeff Gamso
The other day I talked about the decision in Holland v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:40 am
  The lawsuit names Brewer, Angus, Warden Eddie Jones and state Corrections Director Roger Walker as defendants. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:39 pm by AZ
Supreme Court has already addressed the issue of GPS tracking devices in Jones v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:39 pm by AZ
Supreme Court has already addressed the issue of GPS tracking devices in Jones v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409, 409 (1st Dept. 2010); see Landis v 383 Realty Corp., 175 AD3d 1207, 1207 (1st Dept. 2019). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden, and Lord Leggatt. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm by David Ettinger
On April 4 and 5, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): State Building & Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]