Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2014, 7:10 am
North Carolina The United States Supreme Court is also considering the case of Brewington v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm
See Wyandt v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:34 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:00 pm
But the First Amendment is quite clear that a state may enforce a neutral law of general applicability in Employment Div. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
Conclusion This judgment is in some ways surprising and is likely to be controversial. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
In any case, today’s pro se lawsuit, like numerous lawsuits preceding it, goes nowhere and gets a quick dismissal. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
However, in the absence of leadership in Washington, states like Arizona have a responsibility to protect their citizens and uphold the law. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:17 pm
In Castillo v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
This Kat would like to thank his informant (you know who you are) for alerting him to the judgment, which he confesses he missed yesterday. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
The Secretary of State’s justification for the situation is two-fold. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:54 am
The accident occurred at the Massachusetts State Police Emergency Vehicle Operations Center. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am
Download this Insight (PDF) Access the code and data (GitHub repository) Introduction The majority decision in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in McGirt v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
Holding in Art Works, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:34 am
Case citation: Granite State Trade School, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 10:25 am
FCC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 4:40 pm
In Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253, the House of Lords provided some flexibility in respect of the interpretation of the term “likely” here but the judge considered simply that he had to show that “the defendant is likely to fail to establish one of the statutory defences”. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent United States v. [read post]
