Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 39,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2020, 4:59 am
In it, he argued that Rucho v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
I'm a little surprised that this opinion is unanimous.There are three different possible interpretations of the part of the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 USC 1367(d), that says that state limitations periods are "tolled" during the pendency of a federal action (and for thirty days thereafter) if the federal court ultimately exercises its discretion to dismiss supplemental state law claims. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:59 am
Tons of fun stuff in this tiny little trademark dispute. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
Hu was formerly the President of the Stanford Law Review, so I'm sure the justices were rightly confident that he'd do a great job.It probably also helps, just a little, that he's a former law clerk to Justice Liu. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:00 pm
It's not been a good couple of days if you're Safeway.Yesterday, Safeway lost Heyen, an individual wage-and-hour case that Safeway lost at trial to the tune of around $24,000 and in which the Court of Appeal took little time in squarely rejecting Safeway's appeal (filed by their counsel at Littler Mendelson). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
On these facts -- at least at the summary judgment stage -- I have extraordinarily little doubt as to how I'd come out on whether the litigation privilege applies.Because I'm confident that the insurer both recognized and fully anticipated the threat of litigation.As would any insurance company not staffed by morons. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am
I wish to spend a little of your time answering the foregoing question. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Not Enough Original Words You copy a little, But not too much. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
Let us tell you a little bit about this interesting case. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:17 am
In ICC v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 8:51 am
–Martell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
But I think a little more neutral thought and analysis would definitely help. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm
What you know about the lawsuit comes almost exclusively from your lawyer, who's not billing you (so you have very little reason to actively supervise him). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:45 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
See Seibert v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
In RPL Central Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2013] FCA 871, 30 August 2013, Middleton J confirmed that the question of patentability under Australian law is to be guided by the seminal and watershed decision of the Australian High Court in NRDC v Commissioner (1959) 102 CLR 252. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
So often the big things that happen in intellectual property law are tucked away in little cases that deal with procedural issues. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:18 am
In Luedtke v Luedtke Thomsen, 2012 WL 2562405 (S.D.Ind.) [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:02 am
In Valentine-Bowers v. [read post]
