Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 8,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 3:56 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas ruled on the matter today, docketed at 11A745.Days ago the eleventh circuit court of appeals ruled in the case of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:17 am
The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that this expert testimony should in fact be allowed, "[W]e conclude that the reliability of eyewitness identifications frequently is not a matter within the knowledge of an average juror and that the admission of expert testimony on the issue does not invade the province of the jury to determine what weight to give the evidence," the court said. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
From SSRN:Elliott Visconsi, The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Rex v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:26 am
W. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Michael W. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:35 pm
Unfortunately for Spitzer the Supreme Court held the exact opposite by a vote of 9-0 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:01 pm
Scott Maynes (p 247-258)LOREN V. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
District Court for the District of Maryland Judge Roger W. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:12 pm
Are there many sources, no matter how poorly footnoted, that cannot readily be found with a Google search? [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:04 pm
Carter v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
[W]hether a court can enjoin a bill is a matter of great public importance and also because it appears necessary to confirm that Goodland remains the law that all courts must follow.... [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:09 pm
Plaintiff Joshua W. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:55 pm
Albert W. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
Lewton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:10 pm
W is for Welfare Benefits. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 3:28 pm
Read the whole opinion, Maxon v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:30 am
Among other concerns, the Proposed Standards (i) place an unworkable responsibility upon accountants to make subjective assessments of often complex and uncertain legal matters, the probability of future events, and the potential impact of those events, all of which are outside the scope of auditors’ typical responsibilities, (ii) endanger the confidentiality and protections of client communications that are foundational components of the lawyer-client relationship and our legal… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:59 am
A very similar approach has been taken by the CAFC in CyberSource Corporation v Retail Decisions, Inc (Fed. [read post]
