Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said in a case that is one of first impression, this court is confronted with two novel questions: does the attorney confidential privilege survive the death of the client? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
A.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Rather, principles of statutory construction, stripped of the presumption’s “tradition” gloss, adequately and accurately reflect allocate regulatory authority over matters of health a [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
The court explained that[w]e treat a motion for a directed verdict as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
SBA rejected the doctors-don’t-matter refrain from Avandia. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
District Judge Matthew W. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:01 am
GEICO General Insurance Co., December 23, 2015, Traxler, W.). [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent Opinion in the case of Ranocchia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:36 am
In Ortiz v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:32 am
Health Care, P.C. v Republic W. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
The court recognized that prosecutors should not enjoy such broad discretion, stating that “[w]hile the Government might promise that it would not prosecute an individual for checking Facebook at work, we are not at liberty to take prosecutors at their word in such matters. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Laughland v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:00 am
” United States v. 95 Barrels of Alleged Cider, 265 U.S. 438 (1924). [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
And New York law, as interpreted by People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm
Richard W. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
V, § 3(b)(10), Fla. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
`Consequently, [w]hen a man chooses to avail himself of the privilege of doing business as a corporation, even though he is its sole shareholder, he may not vicariously take on the privilege of the corporation under the Fourth Amendment; documents which he could have protected from seizure, if they had been his own, may be used against him, no matter how they were obtained from the corporation. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:37 pm
In today’s case (Grassick v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law Emeritus, and Robert W. [read post]
