Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 42,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2012, 1:10 am
So, for example, if the Patent Owner is seeking discovery as to secondary indicia of non-obviousness to avoid amendment, by the time that evidence is secured (or not) the opportunity to amend the claims may be lost as a matter of right. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 5:54 am
Lastly, it amends the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act to make some of the new investigative powers being added to the Criminal Code available to Canadian authorities executing incoming requests for assistance and to allow the Commissioner of Competition to execute search warrants under the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:51 pm
Judges are required to issue rulings based on the evidence alone and cannot impart their opinions on the matter. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 11:01 pm
However, as counsel for the plaintiff on this motion frankly stated, when the matter was before the court on the Rule 18A application, the credibility of Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 4:23 pm
As a threshold matter, the Supreme Court held that the award should be evaluated under the Court’s usual rules for no-evidence review. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
” It does not hold that “any proffer of countervailing evidence renders an ordinary consequences presumption insufficient as a matter of law” on the question of intent. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
In a sweeping unanimous decision, the seven-member Iowa Supreme Court ruled on April 3 in Varnum v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:24 pm
However, even in cases where you think the evidence is in your favor, the judge or jury may rule differently than you had expected. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 11:11 am
Gathering sufficient evidence to overcome the rule is critical. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:06 am
Ortiz ("The defendant makes the following claims on appeal: (1) that his actions could not, as a matter of law, constitute witness tampering, (2) that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of witness tampering, (3) that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of carrying a pistol without a permit and (4) that the trial court failed to instruct the jury properly as to the elements of witness tampering. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:12 am
And because the facts matter, the 3d DCA went out of its way to explain that even if the personal representative had followed the established rules for pleading personal jurisdiction, the result would have been the same based on the LP’s lack of minimum contacts with Florida. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
The DOL failed to provide any evidence of harm suffered were the implementation of the final rule delayed. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:34 pm
The district court for the First Judicial District affirmed the OAH ruling. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Plaintiffs appealed the court's ruling. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
"[T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact*; 2. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:20 pm
The Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure govern the discovery process. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 11:42 am
This is a matter dealing with the probate of an estate. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:23 am
The Board, however, ruled that the peace symbol is unregistrable and "cannot be considered as a secondary source or acquire distinctiveness based on its prior registration." [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:42 pm
Based on its findings, the appeals court may affirm the trial court’s ruling or reverse the lower court’s decision. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
The Plaintiff additionally testified during his deposition that he thought that the pathologist was indeed a hospital employee.As such, viewing the records in a light most favorable to the Plaintiff as the non-moving party as required by the standard of review for motions for summary judgment, Judge Nealon ruled that it could not be declared, as a matter of law, that a reasonably prudent person in the position of the Plaintiff would not have been justified in… [read post]
