Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 7,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
In US v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Introduction Constitutional theory was once, and not so long ago,[1] the province of the state.[2] Its construction was meant to solidify and protect the ideology of a world order grounded on the state as the supreme (or in Marxist Leninist theory the sole[3]) construction of abstract social-political-economic societies. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:35 am
Judge Thomas P. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
David P. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Au cours de cette période, un dénommé Fournelle, qui effectuait la vérification fiscale en TPS et TVQ, se faisait accompagner d'un dénommé Boudrias. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
"[O]ff-label use is generally accepted" and under the law, "[p]hysicians may prescribe drugs and devices for off-label uses." [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
The Law Office of James P. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:27 am
(loose-leaf)), vol. 2, at p. 38-43. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:52 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today released its decision in Information and Privacy Commissioner et al v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The case in question is Case C‑383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Société Elmar Wolf, a piece of litigation that was kick-started seven and a half years ago when the predecessor of what is now Enviromental Manufacturing (let's just call them EM) applied to register as a Community trade mark a figurative sign representing a wolf’s head for 'machines for professional and industrial processing of wood… [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
See infra p. 6. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
In our previous posts about In re Trados available here and here, we provided some background about the facts, outcome and usefulness of the Trados case, as well as a discussion of the conflicting interests of the preferred stockholders and common stockholders. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[v] The U.N. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Fordyce v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:39 am
The question in Rosemond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:07 pm
Related posts:Povse v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
And it cited the Seventh Circuit’s own precedent in Toth v. [read post]
