Search for: "People v David S." Results 3841 - 3860 of 5,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by Ron Friedmann
One point of view: Expertise is people focused; it’s what they know and their skills. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:24 am by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
" David Rossmiller, quoted in the same story, has one possible reply, which is that people may begin reevaluating "how this amazingly successful man got to be so amazingly successful. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  Philosopher David Chalmers developed the “Extended Mind” theory back in the late 90’s. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:40 am
Circuit's ruling in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am by Frank Cranmer
A week in which we were asked to believe in the Seven Deadly Bins… …a creative interpretation to s.57 Environment Act 2021- Separation of waste, which is unlikely to feature in future editions of The Law of Waste Management, but clearly has potential for one of Davids contributions to Environmental Law & Management. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  This role was exposed in last week’s judgment in R v Norman ([2016] EWCA Crim 1564) which was discussed on the Panopticon blog Roy Greenslade in the Guardian said that the “wrong people were prosecuted over journalists’ payments to police,” and that the police should have been investigating Rupert Murdoch’s publishing business instead of France. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 See, e.g., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
Culley and Sutton contend that courts should apply the three-part test outlined in the court’s 1976 decision in Mathews v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And he drew our attention to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Air Wisconsin v. [read post]