Search for: "People v Word"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 17,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
Some people think of this as a sign of courage; others as an unwarranted smugness. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
In other words, you can be convicted of "attempted" rape of a child just like you can be convicted of "attempted" rape of an adult. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
In other words, the law doesn’t prohibit circumvention to access works that have entered the public domain. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:12 pm
See also Godmar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
In other words, maybe the consumer buys BRAINSTRONG anyway, even if she knows there is a high chance it won't work or even a small chance it might hurt her.My favorite example of the "materiality" limitation on the deceptiveness bar is the GLASS WAX trademark upheld in Gold Seal Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
Means v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
In other words, Trump would have lost. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:40 pm
The case – Inserso Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 1:31 pm
" Nieves v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
” If domain names are notinherently distinctive by virtue of being domain names, it may be necessary to offer a fourth option to make a Teflon survey work, something like “neither a brand name nor a generic word. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Case citation: Court of Master Sommeliers v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Citing the 1971 decision in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
Biskupic then writes an absolutely fascinating line–pay attention to the emphasized words: But once Roberts assigned the cases to Gorsuch and he, as expected, zeroed in on the text of Title VII's ban on discrimination "because of … sex," the majority readily signed on to the opinion declaring that both sexual orientation and gender identity would be covered. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:59 pm
Facebook doesn’t have an obligation to host or promote content that violates its rules, but it does have a duty to connect its users to people and pages of their choosing on other networks. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:00 pm
Spitzer v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
v=F69DQupMiZM (the above is a clip of the Homer moment that I’m thinking of, but my embed function is a bit glitchy so you may need to click and view it on the youtube site to watch). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:11 am
In Bearden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
(That case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
You can also use the film’s social media toolkit to help spread the word, and motivate others to join THE FIGHT. [read post]
