Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
The case, McKenna v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
You remember Casey: The promise of constancy once given, to all those "tested by following" the Supreme Court's "watershed" decisions -- "whether or not mistaken" -- lest the people's "belief in themselves" be shaken and the nation's "understanding of itselfs as a constitutional Republic" be disturbed by the Court's failure to "remain steadfast" in its efforts to preserve its institutional capital as… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:57 am
DotStrategy Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:53 am
In People v, Fredericks, 2017 NY Slip Op 50091 (New York Criminal Court 2017), The accused was observed holding money and rolling dice in the street while six other people exchanged money. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:38 am
In one recent Long Island case, People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm
If you do not like Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 2:00 pm
Bosket has killed and attacked people from a young age both in and outside of prison. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Until the ERISA statute is changed, this unbalanced approach is a license for disability insurer's to put profit over people. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:27 pm
Instead, Circuit Judge William Gordon has decided that the twelve individuals who heard the Ray Keller v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:01 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm
My experience suggests that many, many people do not know about, or possibly know, but do not care to comply with, this rule. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
CBS TRO Motion.pdf (332.51 kb) ABC Opposition.pdf (92.71 kb) CBS v ABC Minute Order.pdf (8.33 kb) [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
” People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:18 pm
In Merrill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:55 am
Parish v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
Cuomo (2020) and Tandon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:02 am
In TYM v Ms. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 pm
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court began to address some of the unanswered questions in People v. [read post]
