Search for: "People v. To" Results 3841 - 3860 of 72,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
The Italian legal proceedings Between 1966 and 1970, a first set of criminal proceedings took place in Italy, as the people suspected of having received and handled Victorious Youth faced accusations of fencing cultural property that belonged to the State.[11] The defendants were acquitted, due to a lack of evidence that Victorious Youth even existed (let alone that it was found in Italian waters). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:41 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Ventura (2011 NY Slip Op 07475 [10/25/11]) the Court of Appeals held that it is an abuse of discretion for intermediate appellate courts to dismiss an appeal because of the involuntary deportation of the appellant. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
But for most (regular) people, not so much.Justice Willhite writes a nice, short, well-written, and entirely correct opinion. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Lovechilde
As we approach the 38th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:37 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Burden shifting Anthony Bowers, appellant, was charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in connection with a shooting outside a bar on December 11, 2016, which injured five people. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 4:45 am
Here is why.Only one issue might be on appeal at the Zhejiang Higher People's Court --the 20 million Yuan in damages for Plaintiff. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:35 pm
The Court of Appeals held in People v Grajales (8 NY3d 861 [2007]) that the People are not required to give 710.30 notice of identifications of the defendant made during a photo identification procedure, such as an array The Court reasoned that because testimony regarding photographic identification procedures is not admissible, the People cannot "intend to offer at trial" such testimony. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 6:41 pm by Rick Hills
With weary predictability, each side, secular and religious, is playing its accustomed role in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although there is no question that a trial court "necessarily has broad discretion to control and restrict the scope of the voir dire examination" (People v Boulware, 29 NY2d 135, 140, rearg denied 29 NY2d 670, cert denied 405 US 995; see People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199), we conclude under the circumstances of this case that the court erred in failing to permit defense counsel to conduct further questioning of the prospective juror to determine whether she… [read post]