Search for: "Persons v. Jones"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 3,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm
On Thursday, Estonia announced that it acceeded to a US request to resettle one detainee from Guantanamo Bay, “as long as that person has not been convicted of a crime. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
Somehow, just as the American people are beginning to consider the grave injustices pervading the capital system, several justices seem to be staking out strong personal positions on this front in the culture wars. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
http://tinyurl.com/4avwrhj (Stephen Arnold) Judge Scheindlin Rules That Metadata is Integral Part of ESI, Admonishes Counsel for Failing to Meet and Confer Concerning Form of ESI Production - http://tinyurl.com/4ul9xmm (Jennifer Hradil) Gavel to Gavel: Pitfalls of Monitoring Social Media - http://tinyurl.com/6j3o8uz (Byrona Maule) Government Appeals and Seeks a Stay of Judge Scheindlin’s FOIA Order on Metadata in NDLON v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:46 am
This is a personal blog, doesn’t purport to give legal advice, reflects my own views and not those of Dale Langley & Co. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Stephanie Tubbs Jones (Case Law, ’74), D-Ohio, served as Chairwoman of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct when this revision was written. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
There is already jurisdiction, deriving from the case of Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) to strike out a case as an abuse of the process if the publication does not amount to a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
As Black notes, in many of the old cases “petty acts” that “no sensible person could think impeachable offenses” served as grounds for removal. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am
Dan Friedman reports for Mother Jones. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
This case is about two people having sex and whether, at the end of the day, one person’s authority over the other made her do something she otherwise wouldn’t have done. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
Like the execution of Claude Jones on December 7, 2000. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
This case is about two people having sex and whether, at the end of the day, one person’s authority over the other made her do something she otherwise wouldn’t have done. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
They say war is hell. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
Background: What the President’s personal counsel and White House Counsel were fighting about. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
Katsas of the Washington office of Jones Day will have 20 minutes for the challengers. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
Other partners include the district's Title V/CSHCN program. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Individual experts can be incompetent, biased, error prone, or fickle—their personal judgments are not and have never been the source of reliability. [read post]
