Search for: "R. B." Results 3841 - 3860 of 55,751
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2021, 2:30 am by Cristina Mariottini
Czech courts submit a request to “all banks in its territory to disclose, upon request by the information authority, whether the debtor holds an account with them” (Article 14(5)(b) of the EAPO Regulation). [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, "the University's website promotes the cultural centers but no other RSOs" is constitutional: [B]ecause what the University says on its own website is government speech—and because the Southworth framework applies only when the government promotes private speech—the University does not have to act with viewpoint neutrality in deciding what to say on its website. [4.] [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:45 am by Russell Knight
R. 201(b)(1) Possible relevant evidence includes emails, Facebook posts, and cell phone data. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Vice Chancellor further noted that MoneyGram’s Articles of Incorporate contain a Section 102(b)(7) provision exculpating the directors from liability except for breaches of the duty of loyalty. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:04 am by Greg Lambert
When it comes to what clients spend on legal services, there are savvy purchasers who look to manage their legal spin based on value and data-driven analytics. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Kwall, “The Repeal of Graduated Corporate Tax Rates,” Tax Notes, June 27, 2011, 1395. [4] Michael R. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
 February 1, 2021 ​​ Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation               In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
 February 1, 2021 ​​ Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation               In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[4] Reprimanded by Canada’s then Prime Minister Lester B. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Bégin, 2021 QCCDPHA 1 (CanLII) [20] Dans l’arrêt Anthony-Cook[3], la Cour suprême a précisé « qu’en présence d’une recommandation conjointe, ce n’est pas le critère de la “justesse de la peineʺ qui s’applique, mais celui plus rigoureux de savoir si la peine serait susceptible de déconsidérer l’administration de la justice, ou serait, par ailleurs, contraire à… [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Juror Micheal B. himself was involved with a crime. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 10:23 am by Greg Mersol
The claims were initially brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and appear to have been conditionally certified under FLSA section 16(b), but there were only three opt-ins. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
Last year, the European Patent Office changed the publication schedule of the Guidelines as part of its Strategic Plan 2023 which meant there was no update to the Guidelines in 2020. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 1:37 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The use of grids is well known in the artAfter his patent was revoked in opposition, the proprietor filed an appeal. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:35 pm by Elizabeth Craig
  Trademark infringement laws generally only protect trademark holders from uses of trademarks by others that are likely to confuse consumers (a) into incorrectly assuming an “affiliation, connection, or association” between the trademark holder and another or (b) “as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of” an alleged infringer’s goods or services. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:39 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The Ninth Circuit said in the Toshiba case that Parkcentral is distinguishable on numerous factual grounds, adding that the principal reason it could not follow Parkcentral is that “it is contrary to Section 10(b) and Morrison itself. [read post]