Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 7,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 10:07 am
Ohio, as explained in my brief in Utah v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 2:55 am
“In my view, the Court’s decision in FCC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet the Court found one in Printz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506 [1990]; see Schrull v Weis, 166 AD3d at 831). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:11 am
Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
--> After a California Highway Patrol officer “issued him a traffic citation for violating [California] Vehicle Code § 23123(a)”, Steven Spriggs “contested the citation. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
For the most part family law cases are resolved by state courts. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
In and of itself, Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Jonathan Nash suggests that two words in Armstrong v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:20 pm
I also got a kick out of Justice Stevens wondering if the OCC had enough personnel to handle state consumer law enforcement. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
In Celebration of Steven Shiffrin's The Religious Left and Church-State Relations. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm
By Steven Daroci [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:07 pm
Steven Lehotsky represents NFIB and SG Ben Flowers represents Ohio. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:32 pm
In McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
The highest-profile case on yesterday’s order list may be Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
” Steven Mazie takes a quick look at the case at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Sure enough, there is one other, just a floor below the Cheshire spectacle: State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:18 pm
Air Force personnel in Germany (United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” Steven Mazie writes at The Economist that if the abortion providers lose, “the consequences could be profound, emboldening anti-abortion legislators in many states to pass new laws squeezing access to abortion. [read post]
