Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 3841 - 3860 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
And the courts should hold that a warrant is required under the Fourth Amendment, which protects Americans against unreasonable searches and seizures of our personal papers and effects. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm by Andrew Dat
Supreme Court to Consider Whether GPS Tracking a “Search” Requiring Warrant is a post from: LegalMatch Law Blog Incoming search terms for the article:match comUS v antoine jonessupreme court gps trackinggps tracker supreme courtsearch and seizure gps supreme courtgps search warrant lawgps tracking supreme courtsupreme court car trackingsearch and seizure by gpssearch and seizure fourth amendment supreme court … [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:31 am
February 17, 2011).* Typographical error as to the city where the property to be searched was located in the warrant was a technical violation since the face sheet had the correct address, which was searched. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:17 am by Susan Brenner
As I’ve explained in prior posts, the 4th Amendment creates a right to be free from unreasonable “searches” and/or “seizures. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm by Olivia
 The Fourth Amendment protects people against “unreasonable searches and seizures” without a warrant that can be obtained only after “probable cause” is established. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:04 am
If you receive a summons and/or a search and seizure warrant from the IRS or FBI, you should immediately contact an experienced federal criminal defense attorney. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:24 pm by Ashby Jones
As long as surveillance technology keeps advancing, Fourth Amendment search-and-seizure law will continue to be a fascinating area to check in on from time to time. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:17 pm by jly
The abstract is available below the fold: The conventional academic account of Fourth Amendment (or search and seizure) history has been shaped by uncritcal acceptance of claims in Supreme Court opinions that the reference to “unreasonable searches and seizures” in that text was intended to created a broad “reasonableness” standard for assessing all government arrests and searches, whether made with or without warrant. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:55 am by Brandon W. Barnett
The officer conducted a pat down search and arrested him for the warrants. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  In addition, search warrants were obtained for computer servers throughout the country , and a seizure warrant was obtained in U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Jim Harper
Nevermind “reasonable expectations”: the people’s right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures is worn down to the nub. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
One of the recognized exceptions to the prohibition against warrant less searches and seizures is work-related investigations. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 7:57 am
Bringing the Fourth Amendment into the Digital Age Among the chief causes of the American Revolution was widespread outrage at the use of “general warrants” and “writs of assistance” by British officers to conduct searches and seizures without judicial oversight. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm by Nathan
Instead, we’re all intrigued about the Senate hearings earlier this week on whether federal law enforcement ought to get a warrant before doing any search and seizure out there in the cloud. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:49 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Search and Seizure Franks motions Even if the officer’s affidavit would have clarified that only one flake of marijuana was found in the defendant’s trash, the affidavit would still support probable cause for a search warrant. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:38 am by Chuck Peterson
Two things seem clear to me: first, the search of a cell phone has nothing to do with the original exception to the warrant requirement for the search incident to arrest. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:16 am by Berin Szoka
The coalition letter explains that framers of the Bill of Rights ratified the Fourth Amendment to protect individuals from unreasonable, unwarranted searches and seizures by government officials. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm by David Kravets
Under the “border search exception” of United States law, international travelers, including U.S. citizens, can be searched without a warrant as they enter the country. [read post]