Search for: "Shields, in Re"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 4,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
France Paris Appeal Court: Che Guevara’s portrait: an icon, not a trade mark (Class 46) Germany German banks move towards deal on patent collateralisation (IAM) Munich Regional Court dismisses actor/comedian Michael ‘Bully’ Herbig’s trade mark and personality rights infringement case against Take Two Interactive over ‘Bully – Die Ehrenrunde’ computer game (Class 46) Polar bear Knut and the ‘big… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:47 am
We can debate the normative or ethical considerations until we’re all blue in the face and ready to rip each other’s heads off, but I am less and less interested in such squabbles. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The most notable is In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:48 pm
We’re no longer racing against an adversary. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:41 am
Page administrators’ identities are shielded; Group administrators’ identities are disclosed. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
" So the government can presumably disarm dangerous convicted felons, whether they're incarcerated or not, without violating the Second Amendment. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
If you’re a defendant, you know you’re in trouble when the court decides it’s on a first-name basis with the plaintiff. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
Crown Cork & Seal, in 2010, in which Willett concurred in a decision striking down a statute that shielded a company from successor liability in a tort case. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
No re-presentment was made to the grand jury. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
We’re happy to report that most of the time they haven’t been successful in avoiding Michigan law.They came closest in Rowe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:23 am
They think they're helping but they're not. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 7:02 am
This classification generally shields the rideshare companies from direct liability for the actions of their drivers. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:51 am
This classification generally shields the rideshare companies from direct liability for the actions of their drivers. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
In accordance with Re S, there should be no default position, or requirement for ‘compelling reasons’, in such cases. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (The IP ADR Blog) (Techdirt) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:09 pm
You’re looking for a solution in the wrong area. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
This time, we don’t care much about the peculiar facts, but rather we’re directing ourselves to the court’s odd reasoning that somehow there’s a conflict between the learned intermediary rule (adopted at some level now in everyAmerican jurisdiction – see our “headcount” post here − and the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (“UCATA”). [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
So settle in, buckle up, hunker down, or do whatever it is that you do when you’re about to experience a serious glut of delicious Supreme Court flummery. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
Leahy (D-Vt.) shares his colleague's view and strongly criticized the "regulatory preemption model" that he claimed the Bush Administration was using to shield corporations from liability - a model he found "especially troubling" in the area of pharmaceutical drugs. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
Michael GreveA pending cert petition in S&M Brands v. [read post]
