Search for: "Smith v. Day"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 4,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 9:41 pm
[LINK FIXED] Leading off this belated edition is the Supreme Court’s holding in Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:18 am
“It's the same thing going on with America these days. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 12:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
(See the government’s Supreme Court brief in Smith v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:06 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Piao v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 8:11 pm
Christopher Smith, 2009 Pa. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
The question presented is what standard the federal court should apply in considering such a claim, and in particular whether the federal court can consider evidence that was not presented to the state courts. ------- Title: Smith v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:24 pm
If you asked me to list the ten worst decisions by SCOTUS in the last decade, Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
The last thing he needs is to get high every day. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
Defendant responded the same day. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
"Under current law, the director is not permitted to make the filing until 45 days after payment is due and 10 days after the uninsured employer fails to comply with any demand to deposit with the director the estimated value of the compensation, and 20 days after orders by the director to pay any assessments for failure to pay. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:06 pm
In today’s case (Roberts v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 7:26 am
A few days ago, I posted an entry about the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
