Search for: "State, in Interest of Jr" Results 3841 - 3860 of 5,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 7:46 pm
Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Krys Godwin, Bar Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although the health, safety, and welfare are substantial government interests, the Township must provide some evidence of how the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance serve those substantial government interests. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by centrallaw
Florida frequently uses this tool in state statutes. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Katerina Papatheodorou
Authorities recently learned that he attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, where Neo-Nazi James Fields Jr. murdered Heather Heyer. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Roberts Jr., but the fundamental reality is that America will remain intensely—and, generally speaking, geographically—divided over abortion for as long as the nation endures. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Jonathan Spontarelli
Maryland: Federal Judge Stops Enforcement of Maryland Election LawCourthouse News Service – Edward Ericson Jr. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:37 pm by Jim Sedor
How could she ask companies about their conflicts-of-interest when the president was being sued over his? [read post]
United States, wherein the university barred interracial dating due to their religious beliefs. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am by Jacob Fishman
We end the Article by analyzing the meaning of “predecessor in interest” for purposes of Rule 804(b)(1), and also whether exculpatory grand jury testimony is admissible against the government under that same rule. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:12 am by Quinta Jurecic
John Huntsman, Jr. will provide opening remarks. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
 §107 of the US Copyright Act states that the fair use of a work is not an infringement of copyright. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The vote results in criminal referrals to the Justice Department, which will decide whether to charge former trade and manufacturing director Peter Navarro and former White House communications chief Daniel Scavino Jr. with misdemeanors that can result in up to one year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000. [read post]