Search for: "State v. Davis " Results 3841 - 3860 of 6,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
  Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
In a dissenting opinion, Senior Judge Davis succinctly explained why the majority’s “crabbed plausibility analysis” was wrong: 3. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
Although not by any means a landmark case, this writer still found it interesting, and wonders where the case would've gone had the claimants argued their case differently (and admittedly, better, by the looks of the comments made by the judge).Source: Davies Collison Cave [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:54 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision May 17, 2013 Justice Davis delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 5 October 2018 Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics [2018] EWHC 2572 (QB) (heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
In  his judgement Lord Justice Davis stated that the offender's conduct was sustained and persistent, even after receiving cease and desist notices, for a lengthy period of time; Evans also used sophisticated equipment for the purpose [at 19]. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen remarks that Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]