Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 3841 - 3860 of 25,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2006, 2:37 pm
" (The stay application was Rashid v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am by Matrix Law
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state has asked the Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision blocking enforcement of four provisions of S.B. 1070, its controversial immigration law. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:55 am by Grabel & Associates
Original Case Details In the case of United States v Trice, the defendant Raheim Trice entered a conditional plea to one count of possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute under federal law. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 11:28 am by Matthew Campbell
On January 21, 2025, in Jacobsen, MT Sec. of State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has ruled that the NAACP may proceed with a lawsuit against the State of Connecticut in claiming that the state violates the one-man-one-vote principle in counting incarcerated individuals as residing in the district where their prison is located rather than the district on which they presently reside.The case is NAACP v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
In the case of Florida v Jardines, (Oral Argument Transcripts) the defendant maintains that a warrantless "sniff test" by a dog at his home with live plants inside violated his right against unreasonable searches. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
Levine suffered, but he utterly misses the point of this law suit, which was her right to bring the case against Wyeth in the state where she lived and the injury occurred and in which state the product was sold and administered, versus being forced to bring it in federal court under the shield of preemption. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Adam Schlossman
United States (10-5443) and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:49 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
United States Attorney General Eric Holder has announced policy changes in the wake of the landmark Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]