Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 3841 - 3860 of 71,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2021, 8:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
 [Peru] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Respondent’s motion for enlargement of time to file motion to dismiss moot. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:41 pm
The transcript of today’s argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:50 am by Will Baude
Here is the introduction: Last June, the headlines said that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:14 am
United States (07-214) and Exxon v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Lockhart v Smith, 2011 WL 4402361 (D.Me.) the District Court granted Kimberly Ann Lockhart’s second Petition for Return of her child. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:32 am by velvel
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUITPETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANCPRELIMINARY STATEMENT Petitioner, Lawrence R. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Despite Justice Whitten’s admonishment in Cass v. 1410088 Ontario Inc. that “[i]f artificial intelligence sources were employed, no doubt counsel’s preparation time would have been significantly reduced”, it is difficult to identify an AI-empowered legal research tool that all Canadian litigators should be using as a matter of basic competence. [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 12:04 pm
In Cook and Anor v Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 219 the New South Wales Court of Appeal rejected an appeal by the defendant borrowers against the relief they were given from an unjust loan contract in their original trial in Permanent Mortgages v Cook. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
On this point, and most curiously, the majority fails to apply, or even cite, the unanimous 2012 judgment in Tatár and Fáber v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:19 am by Peter Briccetti
” Since the Supreme Court’s 2016 case Universal Health Services v. [read post]