Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Biology v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
(Similar concerns surrounded the use of ancestry in Rice v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 7:25 am
The liberal bloc prevailed in 6 cases, including United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
To the surprise of no one who has been paying attention, the June 26, 2013 United States Supreme Court opinions in the cases of United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Indeed, as Justice Scalia suggested, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Writing for the Court and joined by Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Ginsburg, Justice Kennedy recognized that states have historically been allowed to define marriage--subject to Congressional restraints as in Loving v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Breyer, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm
S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm
The Justices did not make us wait: the first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
It’s like the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
His conclusion for the Court – joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan – in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:01 am
In that case, Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:44 am
First use of phrase "legalistic argle-bargle" since 1824's Gibbons v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:52 am
UPDATE 7: Here's Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito and Sotomayor joined the majority opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito and Sotomayor joined the majority opinion. [read post]
