Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm
This case reminds me of the landmark case of Moore v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
There was no evidence that consumers wouldn’t look at it. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:49 am
The 11th Circuit rejected that argument last week in US v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:49 pm
I don't know where your claim is located.) [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
That agenda is designed to make gasoline and electricity more expensive for consumers, families, farmers, truckers-essentially anyone who fills up or flips a switch. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Keithly v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm
"My view is since this is the law related to consumer protection powers, general laws are subject to a more demanding standard. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Sorrel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm
So any notion that my administration has shut down oil production might make for a good political sound bite, but it doesn't match up with reality. . . [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
Viacom International Inc., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm
Twenty years later, fraud protection was built into credit card transactions involving providing personal information; to protect consumers against fraud, gas pumps and retailers, among others, began prompting customers for zip codes. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm
Twenty years later, fraud protection was built into credit card transactions involving providing personal information; to protect consumers against fraud, gas pumps and retailers, among others, began prompting customers for zip codes. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
By Eric Goldman Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
Lord Hoffmann’s foreword In his commendatory foreword to the work, Lord Hoffmann states that: [T]he most admirable part of Mr. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:17 am
Sometimes, this causes the aggrieved party to just give up, feeling that the court will not protect them or do anything even when there are clear violations. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am
Lord Hoffmann’s foreword In his commendatory foreword to the work, Lord Hoffmann states that: “[T]he most admirable part of Mr. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
When content owners reflect on it, many of them decide to leave up content—so there’s no way for a service provider to categorically decide what the copyright owner wants. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:29 pm
It remains to be seen if this decision remains viable when the Supreme Court rules later this year in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
