Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 6,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Mayo Collaborative reviewed how the Majority Opinion is at odds with precedent and the most recent United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Guidelines published last month. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:25 am
Patent Prosecution Highway The United States Patent and Trademark Office has agreements with foreign patent offices that allow applicants to request that their patent application be fast tracked under a patent prosecution highway (PPH) program. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
This is what he delivers:* More misinformation on the Unified Patent Court - this time from the Law Society of Scotland“Time is running out to secure new Scottish patent court! [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:52 am
The Federal Circuit, numerous district courts, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and patent examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have used Alice to reject software patent claims as being patent ineligible. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:28 am
Today’s en banc decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:58 am
Every patent document (i.e., granted patent and pre-grant publication) is categorized by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) under a system referred to as the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC). [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:55 am
LHO has gone on record in an article in Law 360 stating that Defendants did not think it was generic when they filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the mark to be registered. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:45 am
Amidst all this activity, the firm registered its 1,500th client trademark overall with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
Known as the “Dog Ate My Homework Act”, Section 4 of the bill involves a grant of authority to the Director or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to excuse specific late filingsâ€â [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am
In late July the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a "final" (but not final-final) Office action rejecting all claims of the '915 patent. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
At that time the United States Patent and Trademark Office took it upon itself to stop the registration of this mark under the now defunct “disparagement clause”. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 4:16 am
The transportation authority received a trademark on the slogan from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, though unauthorized uses appear to outnumber authorized ones. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:42 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), like the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) and corresponding agencies elsewhere in the world, is trying hard to get its system up to scratch. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
The patent draftsperson can modify your drawings so that it is acceptable to the standards of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
" Therefore, we hold that the requirement in the Article 8 Preamble, i.e., for a refusal of registration in order to invoke the right to apply for and obtain a cancellation of the interfering mark, includes not only a refusal resulting from ex parte examination by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, but also the potential for refusal resulting from the institution of an opposition proceeding before the Board, which determines… [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:19 pm
After the expiration of the Ericsson-Samsung patent cross-license agreement, Ericsson went to court about a year ago, and Samsung's response included 30 petitions with the Patent Trial & Appeal Board of the United States Patent & Trademark Office, each taking aim at an Ericsson patent. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:23 am
The question in this case is whether the United States (specifically, the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:38 pm
The EUTM is a trademark that is valid and can be enforced in all member states of the EU. [read post]
