Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 9,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 3:48 am
Link to Opinion.On February 22, 2007 the Fourth Circuit reversed the grant of a writ of habeas corpus to Wilmer Ordinola, Ordinola v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 10:03 pm
Konarski v Rankin, 603 Fed. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:43 pm
" -- Notes by Edward Gordon Vázquez Menchaca, Fernando (1512-1569). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:23 am
Oakland Tactical Supply, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
In August 2013, a writ challenging the constitutionality of the same MCX Bye Law Rule 15.22 was filed in the Madras High Court (Mary Roseline and Stephen v Geojit Comtrade). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
In August 2013, a writ challenging the constitutionality of the same MCX Bye Law Rule 15.22 was filed in the Madras High Court (Mary Roseline and Stephen v Geojit Comtrade). [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 11:56 am
Historically, the 7th Civil Chamber used to be considered faster and more patentee-friendly than the 21st, but that may change now.I haven't been able to find any other report on those Sharp v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:52 pm
In Setianto v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
Mercifully for us all, the Court is taking next week off. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:12 pm
Basileh v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
As the General Court held in Case T-291/03 Grana Biraghi §55-56: “...OHIM is bound to apply [the CTMR] in such a way as not to affect the protection granted to PDOs .... [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
See Perez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
See Perez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:32 am
See Forest Oil Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
See Perez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:39 am
The Supreme Court, in Imbler v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
See, Kawa v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either… [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
Among the questions before the Court are if the respondents have the standing to challenge the program in court; if the Biden administration exceeded power granted to it by lawmakers; and if the Biden administration used the proper procedures to adopt the program.Podcast: Presidential Power, Standing, and Student Loan ForgivenessCounterman v. [read post]