Search for: "Wells v. Wells" Results 3841 - 3860 of 96,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
  In a recent decision involving constructive dismissal and “reprehensible” conduct by an employer, Qubti v Reprodux Ltd., the Court of Appeal denied an employee damages for intentional infliction of nervous shock as well as aggravated and punitive damages. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:24 am by admin
In a recent decision involving constructive dismissal and “reprehensible” conduct by an employer, Qubti v Reprodux Ltd., the Court of Appeal denied an employee damages for intentional infliction of nervous shock as well as aggravated and punitive damages. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
The Administrator filed an action on October 29, 2019 encaptioned Estate of Sandor v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
However, he relied on the well-established exception to that rule where the statute imposes an obligation for the benefit or protection of a particular class of individuals (per Lord Diplock in Lonrho v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2) [1982] AC 173.) [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:40 pm by Chris Bruni
  Well, from a Defense perspective they do "rule" on this one. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]