Search for: "ADAMS v. ADAMS" Results 3861 - 3880 of 8,025
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2014, 5:37 pm by Mark Summerfield
., Stack & GS Technology Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council [1995] FCA 1427).Changes to the Australian Crown Use provisions were recommended in the Productivity Commission Inquiry Report into the Compulsory Licensing of Patents. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
 DDR Holdings v Hotels.com is a fascinating post-Alice case on US patent-eligibility, involving an invention directed towards merchandising on the internet: David Berry writes it up for PatLit here. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Pearce & Adam Winer, From Emancipation to Assimilation: Is Secular Liberalism Still Good for Jewish Lawyers? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog; other coverage of the grant in Toca came from Adam Liptak of The New York Times and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:16 pm
" Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Warger v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:02 pm
" Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:27 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
 Although Representative Deutch may not see any problems from allowing cameras at the Supreme Court, the Justices themselves are adamant in their opposition to televising their proceedings. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
In the New York Times, Adam Nossiter asserts that these attacks prove that Boko Haram is able to strike “at will” in Nigeria, especially against civilian targets. [read post]