Search for: "BAKER v BAKER"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 4,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
i4i v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:49 pm
In In re Baker: Baker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
(Updated below ... [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Between $50 million and $6 billion may be owed to musicians and artists in Canada (Ars Technica) Chet Baker has sued the major record labels for copyright : Chet Baker v Sony BMG Music, EMI Music, Universal and Warner Music (IPblog) Ottawa record store owner pleads guilty to copyright infringement (Michael Geist) Search engine on ACTA – future Canadian copyright policy (Michael Geist) Canada dragging its feet on open data initiatives (Michael Geist) China… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:09 am
New York - New York federal court finds that a computer used to communicate regularly via the internet is a "protected computer" within the meaning of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Baker & McKenzie "...in the case of Dedalus Foundation v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:21 am
Suvannavejh APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT Land Use and Planning Roads' De-Mapping Reversed; Village Arbitrarily Found Roads 'Useless', Failed SEQRA 'Hard Look' Baker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:29 am
Baker (1999) 20 Cal. 4th 23,33, 82 Cal. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
Baker, 81 N.J. 99, 113 (1979). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:06 pm
Baker (1999).) [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:26 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Daniel Kribs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:10 pm
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am
Second, if it's content-neutral, does it pass the judicial test set forth in Supreme Court cases decided in the 1990s pertaining to the relationship between cable and broadcast television, Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:32 pm
In R. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
Baker, 213 F.3d 638, 2000 WL 554644 (5th Cir. 2000) (unpublished table opinion); United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:05 am
The latest entry is Wallace v. [read post]
