Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 3861 - 3880 of 13,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 12:13 pm by Jeffrey Brown
LEXIS 23791 (9th Cir. 2011) (affirming United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
” (citing Galef v Alexander and Edgar v MITE Corp, respectively, p.15) And so, as agreed by the parties, Dutch law would apply to this action. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:22 pm by Afro Leo
Section 25(2) somewhat complicates the issue in providing that property may be expropriated in terms of law of general application for a public purpose or in the public interest.Dr Dean referred to the Constitutional case of First National Bank of SA Limitedt/a Wesbank v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service; FirstNational Bank of SA Limited t/a Wesbank v Minister of Finance 2002 (4) SA768 (CC) which held that deprivation of property is a genus of… [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa… [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Byers and others v Saudi National Bank, heard 12th July 2023. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm by Law Lady
WYNDSONG ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to bank because an issue of material fact existed as to when the bank took possession of the note -- Argument that the note followed the mortgage when the mortgage was assigned to bank is flawed because the mortgage follows assignment of the noteJOSEPHINE BRISTOL, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 7:59 am
Upon remand of Thompson's remaining state claims, one of the defendants, Provident Bank of Maryland, requested entry of final judgment in its favor pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), which provides:"When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or… [read post]