Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 21,346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
The petitioners’ brief in DeBoer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am
As is well known, the BTWC has no formal institutional setup in which the body might be integrated. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am
But many jobs are ministerial, meaning that they are a warm body filling a position that needs to be done but can effectively be done by anyone with the marginal competence to perform the duties. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm
That included State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:28 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:28 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
In recent times, the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei and ZTE [2020] UKSC 37 Overview The principle issue before the Supreme Court was whether or not an English court was able and entitled to set the terms of a global portfolio FRAND (“fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory”) licence for patents declared by a standards body to be essential for the technology in question (“Standard Essential Patents” or “SEP”s) where all the parties had not… [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
In Marchand v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 11:29 am
Notes and CommentsLouis René Beres, Complex Intersections: Law, War and Justice in Defense of Israel In Focus: Global Policies and LawLeonardo Borlini & Luigi Crema, The Legal Status of Decisions by Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Authoritative Interpretations or mission éducatrice? [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Brentwood Industries v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm
McConnell would also need two-thirds of the body to invoke cloture on a rule change — unless he deployed the so-called “nuclear option. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 9:28 am
Case citation: Alexander v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
From Santiago v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:11 am
The homeless protections were in place for two decades as part of the landmark settlement in Pottinger v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
