Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 4,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
30 May 2025, 4:19 am
United StatesMahdawi v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
The Act bans insider trading by members of Congress and their staff as well as various other executive branch and judicial branch employees. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
The civil rights revolution begins with the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:36 am
No district court patent decision in years has stirred as much controversy or generated as much comment as the summary judgment decision of Judge Robert Sweet, in the case titled Association For Molecular Pathology, et al. against United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 9:01 pm
EXECUTIVE ORDER The Executive Order outlines a series of measures aimed at reducing the use of criminal penalties for regulatory violations and increasing transparency in the enforcement of such offenses: First, the Executive Order states that it is the policy of the United States that: (i) criminal enforcement of regulatory offenses is disfavored; (ii) criminal prosecution is “most appropriate” for persons who know—or can be presumed to know—of the… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Here’s a bit of history, mostly from my reading of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am
Workers’ rights and the Supreme Court — Joseph Seiner, The Supreme Court’s New Workplace: Procedural Rulings and Substantive Worker Rights in the United States (Cambridge University Press 2017): Seiner argues that the Supreme Court has systematically eroded the rights of minority workers through subtle changes in procedural law. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:11 pm
For common law countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, their attitude towards applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is open, and in general, such applications meet this criterion. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court clarified in the 2017 case NLRB v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
Specifically at issue in the case of Trump v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:51 am
In June 2024, after an oral hearing in Bulone v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
It is an extraordinary power grab by the judicial branch, showing disrespect to two coequal branches: Congress, which saw it fit to authorize an expert agency to review these decisions; and the Executive Branch, which uses a U.S. [read post]
