Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
Interestingly, all of the inverse condemnation decisions were handed down by California’s various appellate courts, with California’s Supreme Court handing down the only eminent domain decision. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Jason James Zamora – Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District – State of California – October 29th, 2015 – In this case involving a fight at a bar, the defendant hired Dr. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
(Read more about state cannabis law at California Cannabis Law.) [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
(Read more about state cannabis law at California Cannabis Law.) [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:44 am
” In these cases, which will be argued together, two California Catholic schools are challenging rulings by the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 9:41 am
Here are the other top-side amicus briefs supporting the petitioner: Brief of Amici Curiae the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties in Support of Petitioner Steve A. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am
Jerry Brown and state judges for "the New California. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:43 am
The trial court and the California Court of Appeal agreed with the tribe that tribal sovereign immunity barred the suit. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Castle rebuffed a State’s attempt to bar a federally licensed motor carrier from its highways for past infringements of state safety regulations. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:05 pm
Supreme Court barred death sentences for crimes committed by juveniles under the age of 18. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:55 am
Last October, Dawson disrupted a House session by yelling he was a prophet of God, prompting the District of Columbia Superior Court to issue a "stay away order" that barred him from the Capitol grounds. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
(Note: Just last month the California supreme court took a major step backward by modifying a 1985 decision that had properly limited the power of government agencies to retain private plaintiffs attorneys on a contingency fee basis to prosecute nuisance litigation.) [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:12 pm
As a threshold matter, the panel determined that the dormant Commerce Clause (whose aim is to limit economic protectionism through regulations designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors) did not bar application of the California Labor Code to interstate employers, and that certain federal statutes did not preempt the California Labor Code’s application to interstate employers operating across state… [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:12 pm
As a threshold matter, the panel determined that the dormant Commerce Clause (whose aim is to limit economic protectionism through regulations designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors) did not bar application of the California Labor Code to interstate employers, and that certain federal statutes did not preempt the California Labor Code’s application to interstate employers operating across state… [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:53 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act; Administrative Procedure Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html San Carlos Apache Tribe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:58 am
Earlier this year, the American Bar Association awarded her its James I. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:13 am
We regularly appear in bankruptcy courts, district courts and superior courts. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:06 am
We suspect (although precise data is not available) that state court filings, especially in key states like California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts, have at least similar increases in state court wage and hour lawsuits. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:58 am
And the Supreme Court held then that states should not be forced to "straight jacket" themselves (in the Court's words) to the common law procedure of old England that was found in the Bill of Rights, but should be free to experiment to create more efficient criminal and civil procedure. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:30 am
And the Supreme Court held then that states should not be forced to "straight jacket" themselves (in the Court's words) to the common law procedure of old England that was found in the Bill of Rights, but should be free to experiment to create more efficient criminal and civil procedure. [read post]
