Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 31,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2018, 3:50 pm
To figure out what the defendant's sentence was, all you need to know are the offenses for which he was convicted:"Defendant was convicted of five counts of sexual penetration of a child 10 years old or younger; 1 three counts of oral copulation of a child 10 years old or younger; five counts of preparing pornographic images of a minor; one count of possessing child pornography; and one count of sexual exploitation of a child. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:45 pm
"Shouse was found to have an expansive cache of child pornographic material, including 82 child pornography images on an iPhone, and an old cellular phone SD card containing 264 child pornography images as well as18 child pornography videos, nearly all of which Shouse produced himself as he committed sexual acts on a female infant. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
Yet there you are at the end, sexually abusing a child and taking pictures of it.Ugh. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 3:17 am
It's worth noting there are some elements - such as child support or child custody - that generally can't be decided in such a contract. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 5:57 am
See, e.g., West v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
One recent case, entitled Ricci v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
One recent case, entitled Ricci v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 12:59 pm
What a joy it must be to be a child actor. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
The August 15, 2012 Court of Appeals opinion in DiMarco v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 12:37 am
Filed April 4, 2007--Opinion by Judge James R. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:16 pm
BEARDEN V. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:36 pm
In Galante v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:25 am
In New York, the best interests of the child are paramount in custody and visitation disputes. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 7:10 pm
In re: Michelle Dougherty-Kelsay v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
The case of Lemon v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:21 am
The worldwide fight against child marriage is a worthy goal. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
To be a relevant child, one must first have been an eligible child: section 23A(1) . [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
To be a relevant child, one must first have been an eligible child: section 23A(1) . [read post]
