Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
Heymann: C&D letters—TM owners are trying to push people off. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Otherwise, that person may be discharged from custody, and the Requested State may refuse a subsequent extradition request from the Requesting State for that person for the same offense. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
(Report of the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights 19 Dec. 2018)The Report may be accessed HERE in multiple languages: HRC 40th 19/12/2018A/HRC/40/57 Guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms - Report of the Independent Expert on the effects of… [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, as well as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, also may exempt any individual from US-VISIT. 8 CFR 235.1(f)(1)(iv)(B). --------------------------------------- 2 Effective January 23, 2007, 8 CFR 235(d)(1)(iv) was redesignated as 8 CFR 235.1(f)(1)(iv). 71 FR 68412 (Nov. 24, 2006). --------------------------------------- B. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
See Baloco v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:45 am
But worse yet, Roberti v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:44 pm
In Romer v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:29 pm
Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts, § 652, cmt c (emphases added); see Jeffries v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
(Alan S. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Finding that option B is “less restrictive” than option A suffices to demonstrate that option A is not the least restrictive option, but tells us nothing about whether there exists yet another option — option C, D or E — that might be even less restrictive still. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:54 am
Some courts have even interpreted CAA Sections 175A(d), 182(b), and 172(c)(1) to mean that states seeking redesignation for ozone and PM2.5 must provide for the implementation of reasonably available control measures (RACM) and reasonably available control technology (RACT) —which are applicable to nonattainment areas—in their SIPs (e.g., the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Wall v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:04 pm
Jeremy C. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:46 am
Auth. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm
BC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 11:56 am
From Logue v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
[C.] [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
This is important because states otherwise have an incentive to capture benefits while exporting burdens. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
Presumably, it will be MDL'd to the E.D. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) to a state appellate court which held that the evidence was sufficient.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming) Title: Allison v. [read post]
