Search for: "Doe Officers"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 137,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 6:35 am
The post Challenge to Prior Restraint on Critics of Police Officer Ends With a Whimper appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:14 pm
Also, the defendant does not have to know that officers are in pursuit for it to be hot pursuit. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 10:15 am
A patrol vehicle with the Orlando Police Department is in the picture, but it does not appear that this vehicle has any damage to it. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
Recently, we received word that our attorneys here at the Law Office of David S. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:54 am
A member of the public would need to dig into the details of the Patent Office files to discover exactly what additional period of grace has been allowed, and in what circumstances. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:45 am
Bouschor II and Jennifer Ramos here at the Law Office of David S. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
A reasonable police officer could believe that appellant was attempting to destroy the mari[j]uana or the computer or both, or even flee from the officers or engage in some action that might threaten officer safety. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:21 am
Yes, the USPTO has Rule 56, which attempts to define the duty and obligation, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit does not feel that it is bound by the definition of the duty owed to the Patent Office, even though Rule 56 was set forth by the Patent Office. [read post]
24 Jul 2003, 2:44 pm
The judges are pushing for a gun-free workspace, while police officers contend that the courthouse does not have secure storage facilities for firearms. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:21 am
Yes, the USPTO has Rule 56, which attempts to define the duty and obligation, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit does not feel that it is bound by the definition of the duty owed to the Patent Office, even though Rule 56 was set forth by the Patent Office. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 7:15 pm
" (30-love)Barrister: "Does that make you a technical expert? [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
Call our office at 469-333-3333 and set up a free consultation and case evaluation. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:21 am
Patent and Trademark Office; a provisional application also fulfills this requirement. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
Where does the rest go? [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:09 am
The most recent announcement declares that the Office will reject any inventor oath or declaration submitted after July 2008 that does not acknowledge a duty to disclose information material to patentability as defined in Rule 1.56. 37 CFR 1.63(b)(3) expressly requires that the oath include a statement that “acknowledges the duty to disclose to the Office all information known to the person to be material to patentability as defined in §… [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
While directors and officers are vested with almost unlimited discretion to make business decisions, that discretion does not extend to corporate lawbreaking. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
While directors and officers are vested with almost unlimited discretion to make business decisions, that discretion does not extend to corporate lawbreaking. [read post]
25 May 2016, 10:52 am
This should not reflect on the hundreds of officers that are outstanding in the performance of their duties, but unfortunately, it does. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
While being arrested by a police officer does not automatically mean that you will be charged with a crime, it usually means that you are suspected of committing a crime and you should be aware of what may happen and what you should do to protect yourself from what the future may hold. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
While being arrested by a police officer does not automatically mean that you will be charged with a crime, it usually means that you are suspected of committing a crime and you should be aware of what may happen and what you should do to protect yourself from what the future may hold. [read post]
