Search for: "English v. English" Results 3861 - 3880 of 11,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2021, 4:58 am by Rose Hughes
 The "essence of the invention" is a concept favoured by English judges which also turns up in the application of the doctrine of equivalents under Actavis (see Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC 63 (Pat), IPKat). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
So it is with the arbitration contract, which the UK Supreme Court has discussed at length in its recent judgment in Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:59 am by Robin Shea
But this is a very hot issue right now – keep particular watch on the case of Coats v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am by Verena von Bomhard
  The General Court denies likelihood of confusion, contrary to EUIPO In one of its last decisions in the old year (judgment of 19 December 2019, T-40/19, Amigüitos pets & live v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
In HLB Kidsons (A Firm) v Lloyds Underwriters & Others [2007] EWCH 2699, a dispute arose over whether the claimant firm of accountants had properly notified claims to the defendant insurers. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 9:04 am
In Patel v Windsor Life Assurance Company Ltd [2008] EWHC 76, the claimant beneficiary sought to enforce his interest in a life insurance policy against the defendant insurer following the alleged death of the insured. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Brian Cordery
Cross-examination is a key feature of trials in the English Patents Court and one of which many English litigators are particularly proud. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
See Benefield, 160 So. 2d at 710 (stating that section 901.19 “appears to represent a codification of the English common law which recognized the fundamental sanctity of one’s home”); State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am by Joel Goldstein
Having decided two maritime-law cases during its October 2018 term, the Supreme Court will consider its third admiralty case in just over a year when it hears argument in CITGO Asphalt Refining Company v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
If I cause customers to avoid your business because I express critical opinions about your business—or because I publicly criticize any customers who visit your business (see NAACP v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
However, the other portion of the English-speaking public will not regard ASOS as the acronym for ‘as seen on screen’. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
This reform would reverse the burden of proof, bringing English libel law up to global standards. [read post]