Search for: "Habeas Corpus Cases"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 4,148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 3:19 am
The Georgia Resource Centerhandled his first state habeas corpus petition. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:19 am
Stewart may enter 20 yr retire plan in Cayuga county 220
S5747
SALAND -- Relates to chapter 425 of the laws of 2002 amending the education law relating to safe attendance and chapter 153 of the laws of 2006 amending "No Child Left Behind Act" 219
S5558
LEIBELL -- Extends certain foster care demonstration programs until December 31, 2009 218
S5345
FARLEY -- Relates to the expiration of the Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor Commission… [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:15 am
When it comes down to the actual issues of procedure, evidence, secrecy, review, habeas corpus, how long detention could go on, etc., etc., however, it might turn out that there is no real room for compromise at all. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 4:53 am
Seven of the nine non-police witnesses for the prosecution have recanted or contradicted their testimony in sworn affidavits; nine witnesses have implicated another man in the murder.Despite this, Davis' habeas corpus petition was denied by the state court on a technicality -- evidence of police coercion was "procedurally defaulted," so the court refused to hear it. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 1:53 am
The 9th (O'Scannlain joined by Brunetti and Trott) reject broad-based constitutional challenge to AEDPA on the basis that it effectively suspends the writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:45 am
A suspect was convicted of murder, and a federal judge hearing his case explicitly gave him 17 days to appeal the denial of habeas corpus -- habeas being a centuries-old court procedure, guaranteed by the Constitution, which allows those convicted of crimes to appeal their convictions. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Padilla Case (Mar. 11, 2003)7. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 1:13 am
Earlier a state court had denied his habeas corpus petition - evidence of police coercion - on a technicality, ruling that the petition was "procedurally defaulted," that is, not raised earlier. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 11:16 am
The Oregon Federal Defenders submitted another amicus curiae brief, this time aimed at the inadequate non-habeas remedies and human costs of suspension of the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus (here). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
With the exception of his subsequent writ of habeas corpus, Kenneth's appeals have been exhausted. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 9:53 pm
As noted here, President Clinton supported and signed legislation that increased the severity of federal and state sentencing terms, broadened the applicability of the federal death penalty, and sharply restricted habeas corpus rights for prisoners. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
The 2-1 majority found that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 was constitutional in its stripping of the writ of habeus corpus in certain cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:20 pm
Harris's big mistake, you see, was killing a woman whose parents could afford to put up a big reward.Judge Mathesius didn't preside over the trial, but six years later he heard Harris's petition for post-trial relief (what many states would call a petition for habeas corpus). [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Do detainees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba have access to habeas corpus under the Constitution or by statute? [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Clark appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:36 pm
Circuit concluded that Guantanamo Bay is part of Cuba, not the United States, and that application of the habeas statute to persons detained at the base would not be consistent with the historical reach of the writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600, validly stripped federal court jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions filed by foreign citizens imprisoned indefinitely at the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay. 2. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:15 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Friday agreed to hear the appeals [order list, PDF] of Guantanamo Bay detainees who are seeking habeas corpus review of their detentions. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:02 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 in the consolidated case that the Guantánamo detainees have no constitutional right to habeas corpus review of their detentions in federal court. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:58 am
I wanted to highlight this article by Richard Fallon and Daniel Meltzer, which systematically goes through all of the issues related to habeas corpus, due process, and the detainee cases. [read post]
