Search for: "High v State"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 35,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 9:36 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 4:49 pm
” (Duncan v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Last week’s decision in Tamiz v Google (High Court, Eady J) comes at a very important time for the debate on the liability of Internet intermediaries. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:54 pm
He then examined our own rich jurisprudence on the issue – the leading case being Independent Newspapers v Minister for Intelligence. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:36 am
Notably, in the Sabarimala judgement, Justice Chandrachud observed that the rationale used by the Bombay High Court in Narasu Appa Mali v State of Bombay, which held that personal laws should not be subject to fundamental rights, is not sustainable. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 12:48 pm
There were a number of other considerations as well, but ultimately, the state high court affirmed the grant of summary judgment to defendants. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:10 pm
Therefore lawyers play a key role in ensuring that the courts, whose mission is fundamental in a State based on the rule of law, enjoy public confidence. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:57 pm
Some caseloads remain dangerously high. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:19 pm
In issuing this opinion, the state high court: (1) clarified that state courts should follow longstanding federal court guidance in Faragher v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:28 pm
Garcia-Brower v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:21 am
State courts had never decided on Kindler's claims. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:56 am
Supreme Court OB v Aventis Pasteur SA [2010] UKSC 23 (26 May 2010 Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penner, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1155 (05 May 2010) Gill, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1154 (07 May 2010) Miller v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1153 (26 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Shiner & Anor, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 558 (26 May 2010) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Appleby, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 926 (29 April 2010) Jones, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 925 (29 April 2010) Kazantzis, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 712 (16 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RW v SW [2010] EWCA Civ 457 (29 April 2010) Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) Parker v Secretary of State for… [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Then the high cost of the “review” stage of e-discovery will disappear. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
State v. [read post]
S.D.Tex.: Stolen motorcycle outside house where arrest warrant was served supported protective sweep
10 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
