Search for: "In Interest of Jones" Results 3861 - 3880 of 7,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Lloyd-Jones raised defences of truth, common law qualified privilege and comment. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm by Tim Zinnecker
From an email that I received earlier today: Tulane University Law School is currently seeking candidates to fill its recently vacated chair in comparative law, the Eason-Weinmann Chair of Comparative Law, and one of two chairs without subject-matter restriction, the recently vacated Joseph Merrick Jones Chair of Law, and the new David Boies Distinguished Chair in Law. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by Maritime Blogger
Jones Act Employers Will Not Be Held Responsible for Acts of Its Employees Which Are Not in Furtherance of the Employer’s Business Interests An important decision affecting vicarious liability for Jones Act employers for the acts of their employees was issued August 14, 2012 by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Steve Hall
Jones and other experts cautioned that the effect might not apply broadly to other kinds of criminal defendants. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:05 am by VALL Blog Master
Young-Jones from Reed Smith shared her experiences about being embedded in her firm's intellectual property group. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by Ted Folkman
Chafin, an interesting case under the Hague Child Abduction Convention. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:57 am
I read an article in the Fort Worth Star Telegram this morning which caught my interest as a Dallas-Fort Worth personal injury lawyer: a Cleburne woman, Jennelle Carillo, is suing Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys after she suffered third-degree burns allegedly from sitting on a black marble bench at Cowboys Stadium two years ago. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:03 pm
Similarly, family arrangements between parent and child are often not contracts which bind them, see Jones v Padavatton,[[1969] 2 All E.R. 616]. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm by Jay Stanley
Jones that when the police attach a GPS device to a car, that is a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:53 am by Kim Zetter
On Tuesday, the ACLU filed a lawsuit against the FBI (.pdf), seeking the immediate release of the documents on the grounds that the public has a strong interest in knowing how the FBI is complying with the ruling. “How the FBI implements the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones will shape not only the conduct of its own agents but also the policies, practices and procedures of other law enforcement agencies – and, consequently, the privacy rights of Americans,”… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:02 am by Orin Kerr
Justice Alito’s concurring opinion in Jones did not change this because the defendant was monitored for only three days, which was not long enough to implicate the concerns of “comprehensive” monitoring that arose with 28 days of GPS monitoring in Jones. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:53 am by Miriam Cherry
  To quote the words of a Howard Jones song, “things can only get better. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:56 am by SHG
The vice presidential debate — remember: Joe Biden taught constitutional law  – could be very interesting, as Professor Blackman points out. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by J. Adam Engel
”  The court considered the effect of Jones on this question. [read post]