Search for: "In the Matter of"
Results 3861 - 3880
of 361,123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
The person requested anonymity discussing private matters. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:51 am
Are enough of the undecided voters paying attention yet, and if they are, do debate shows matter to them? [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:33 am
Limited access to information: Lack of clarity regarding legal rights, healthcare options, or financial matters can leave individuals dependent on others. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:32 am
Changing passwords: Having access to financial matters is important to both spouses. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:30 am
If the administrative law judge does not help your case, we can request a formal review of the matter by the appeals council. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:29 am
Being financially informed enables you to make the most of your retirement years, allowing you to focus on what truly matters. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:20 am
Leah Durant BioExperienced litigation attorney Leah Durant focuses on representing clients in complex vaccine litigation matters. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:20 am
This analysis depends on the facts.The loss was covered as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:40 am
. ___ (2024), finding that when an expert witness conveys a non-testifying analyst’s statements in support of the expert’s opinion, and the statements provide that support only if true, the statements are offered for the truth of the matter asserted and thus are hearsay implicating the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
Second, if this aspect of rhetoric is understood, we will notice when it is offered in a way that marginalizes some citizens by excluding them from its audience and implying that they don’t matter and that their concerns are beneath notice. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:23 am
TRUMP-LEGAL MATTERS U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:15 am
This exception has been held to permit Congress to assign certain matters to agencies for adjudication even though such proceedings would not afford the right to a jury trial. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:06 am
Plaintiff fails to show that defendant made statements on its website or in a standard form retainer agreement that promised the public that the scope of its representation in personal injury matters encompassed enforcement and collection proceedings[*2]. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:59 am
**I am reliably informed Jim Crockett’s attorney refused to allow the question of whether match outcomes were pre-determined to ever get answered during depositions in this matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Aslan infringed Off-White’s trade mark rights and the matter was subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal of The Hague.Appeal before the Court of Appeal of The HagueIn so far as concerned the question of liability on part of Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
., 9 Cal. 5th 279, 462 P.3d 461 (2020), the California Supreme Court held that in an action under the California's Unfair Competition Law or False Advertising Law seeking injunctive relief and civil penalties, the gist of the actions is equitable, and there is no right to a jury trial in such actions under California law either as a statutory or constitutional matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
Today, only the networking objective still seems to matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Confronted with the many congressional statutes that broadly delegated power in the 1790s, they claim that each of those acts falls into some exceptional category to which the nondelegation doctrine was supposedly inapplicable or weakly applicable, especially non-coercive matters or non-domestic matters. [read post]
